From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 24, Issue 78 Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:56:59 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4c828$Blat.v2.2.2$c05ec5a0@zahav.net.il> References: <01c4c762$Blat.v2.2.2$2172a360@zahav.net.il> <55B26C6E-3359-11D9-B71D-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> <01c4c77d$Blat.v2.2.2$cd5bc740@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100203425 32038 80.91.229.6 (11 Nov 2004 20:03:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 11 21:03:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CSLAI-00084y-00 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:03:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSLIn-0001yL-HF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:12:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CSLId-0001xp-Em for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CSLIc-0001xH-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSLIc-0001xE-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.15] (helo=balder.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CSL9k-0006aF-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:02:57 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (pns03-208-44.inter.net.il [80.230.208.44]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DWB01350 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:02:53 +0200 (IST) Original-To: "Jan D." X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: (jan.h.d@swipnet.se) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29758 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29758 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: "Jan D." > Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:25:56 +0100 > > > Perhaps some of the recent changes screwed the v1.x build (I last > > tried to build with v1.x several years ago, and I'm not even sure it > > will build now), but adding more such problems is hardly the way to > > treat that ;-) > > No, that is true. But now there is another problem. Either v1.x > doesn't build because of older changes, or it does not build because of > my changes. It doesn't build because of older changes. I added to my todo to fix that one of these days, it simply shouldn't test for djecho for v1.x. djecho is only required for building Leim, so we should not fail the whole build if djecho is absent. As for your change with buildobj.lst, that line in the Makefile will work with the shell's built-in ECHO commad. Thus no need to edit Makefile.in at that point. > The question is then should v1 be declared unsupported It _is_ unsupported, since I didn't build with v1.x for a long time. > (in which case I think config.bat should exit with an appropriate > message) I don't want to drop v1.x entirely as long as I don't know for sure that it cannot be built. > or the code changed for v1 so Emacs does build? AFAIK, the v1 version should build. I'm not aware of any problems that would prevent that, except for the djecho gork.