From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:16:40 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <01c4ab96$Blat.v2.2.2$19340460@zahav.net.il> References: <20041004212031.GB2219@fencepost> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097061627 7888 80.91.229.6 (6 Oct 2004 11:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 06 13:20:17 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CF9qC-00072a-00 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:20:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CF9wt-0002lq-BT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CF9wm-0002lZ-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CF9wm-0002lG-5i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CF9wm-0002lD-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.15] (helo=balder.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CF9pq-0007nB-VI; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:19:55 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.143.237]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DUU68393 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:19:51 +0200 (IST) Original-To: "Jan D." X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: (jan.h.d@swipnet.se) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27991 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27991 > From: "Jan D." > Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:40:02 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I have checked in a test that runs a program and sees if the heap start > address is random. Doesn't this harm cross-building Emacs? I always thought that running a test program at configure time should be avoided, and that tests that only compile or link programs should be peferred.