From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jerome.marant@free.fr: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:37:56 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <01c4a703$Blat.v2.2.2$9a627220@zahav.net.il> References: <1096291271.415813c757a26@imp6-q.free.fr> <20040927134714.GA20012@fencepost> <87hdphx91c.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87655wswkv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <01c4a6f8$Blat.v2.2.2$f6ef61c0@zahav.net.il> <20040930143404.GB2296@fencepost> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096559185 26331 80.91.229.6 (30 Sep 2004 15:46:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jmarant@free.fr, rlb@defaultvalue.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 30 17:46:08 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CD38B-0004om-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:46:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD3EW-00021x-R6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD39X-0000Gw-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD39V-0000FV-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD39V-0000En-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CD32w-000425-By; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:40:42 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.240]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CSL30152 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:40:40 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Miles Bader X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <20040930143404.GB2296@fencepost> (message from Miles Bader on Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:34:04 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27716 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27716 > Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:34:04 -0400 > Cc: Rob Browning , jmarant@free.fr, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Miles Bader > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > The situation you describe, where both a branch and a trunk version > > are undergoing a pretest never happened before, since Emacs > > development until now assumed that we don't have enough resources to > > do that, and so there was at most one pretest at a time. I'm not sure > > we can change that, given the available resources. > > Um, the whole point of this thread is that more resources are on offer, for > this specific purpose. Like everyone else, I'm grateful for the offer, but I think you know that it takes more to pretest a version than just administrative help we are offered. If this is enough to be able to run 2 pretests in parallel, I just don't know; thus ``I'm not sure'' above.