From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jerome.marant@free.fr: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:31:20 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <01c4a702$Blat.v2.2.2$ae581d80@zahav.net.il> References: <1096291271.415813c757a26@imp6-q.free.fr> <20040927134714.GA20012@fencepost> <87hdphx91c.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87655wswkv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <01c4a6f8$Blat.v2.2.2$f6ef61c0@zahav.net.il> <1096554738.415c18f2017de@imp4-q.free.fr> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096558582 24296 80.91.229.6 (30 Sep 2004 15:36:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 30 17:36:13 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CD2ya-0003fi-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:36:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD34z-0007Qq-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD349-0007DK-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD348-0007CY-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:41:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD347-0007BS-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.15] (helo=balder.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CD2wk-0002oL-2f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.240]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DUR35472 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:34:04 +0200 (IST) Original-To: jmarant@free.fr X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <1096554738.415c18f2017de@imp4-q.free.fr> (message from =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant on Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:32:18 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27713 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27713 > Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:32:18 +0200 > From: =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant > Cc: Rob Browning , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > So, are you telling that maintaing bugfix release like we proposed > is not doable because of the current numbering scheme? I don't understand what ``like we proposed'' means. I don't think the current scheme disallows anything. > If not, what do you propose? To keep the current scheme.