From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bootstrapping fails Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:49:57 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <01c486c5$Blat.v2.2.2$1b78d700@zahav.net.il> References: <200408191530.i7JFU9l27365@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093013709 4250 80.91.224.253 (20 Aug 2004 14:55:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 16:55:00 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ByAnE-0006gg-00 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:55:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ByArX-0001cF-LP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ByArQ-0001bz-4h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:59:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ByArM-0001bk-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:59:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ByArL-0001bh-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.15] (helo=balder.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ByAmy-0004NB-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.154.60]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DTR10714 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:54:32 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <200408191530.i7JFU9l27365@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:30:09 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26342 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26342 > Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:30:09 -0500 (CDT) > From: Luc Teirlinck > > What is weird is that wait_reading_process_input ia apparently defined > _twice_ in process.c, once on line 4015, once on line 6879. That's normal: the first definition is for the version that supports async subprocesses, the second one for the one that does not (currently, only the MS-DOS build uses the second definition). You will see that there's a line saying #else /* not subprocesses */ somewhere near line 6832 in process.c.