From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] (icomplete-vertical-mode): Add support for affixations and, annotations Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 02:47:30 +0300 Message-ID: <01aa3213-2bb3-bf10-a1d9-0cb9c123a28e@yandex.ru> References: <87lf82g10g.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2c24lww.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871r9t2lsy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <22880197-6d05-c821-2c58-328ed3cfc02e@daniel-mendler.de> <87eedruui3.fsf@gmail.com> <8dd915fe-fe67-2a45-67ff-8aaa3e9b9aca@daniel-mendler.de> <878s3zuq47.fsf@gmail.com> <09f2a253-84ba-5cfd-552e-0b89109864a5@daniel-mendler.de> <875yyxaoxp.fsf@gmail.com> <871r9laj6a.fsf@gmail.com> <1a183c3b.2f2f.179cb27f64c.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <87lf7s7lli.fsf@gmail.com> <2dd59f1c-1d4d-a7d7-fae5-d9ca9b5c90c2@yandex.ru> <8e0cfb49-4ce3-c9aa-21fd-f0063b7c8107@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2225"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 Cc: tumashu , Juri Linkov , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , Daniel Mendler To: Stefan Monnier , =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 06 01:48:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpg1Q-0000QY-Rx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 01:48:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60714 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpg1P-0007Wi-F8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpg0u-0006q6-EO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:43762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpg0s-0007Zb-H0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 3-20020a05600c0243b029019f2f9b2b8aso7712026wmj.2 for ; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 16:47:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IaTN4YD22GrNzsUHO43/JYgxFsHvykeRhdASSy/A3E=; b=vC+s+zW47Lsuho/Mx/8P7QVVze29hcgrzjK2L9b0MYVHOA5kuj4CpMCgrY4apfme0n ID1L+u5X94FoURL389aUsvrwjiL5fzF2NrzKyVnELt9TLv5iBXBljiVplADXQMuc1THP PClzF73boWkGsSgMR7X1lyZexvqAPl2KmFqo3NT7y3slMuUnNQYGHORXiW7NfZXjy7jp Jx0g9BXhAmpEGCvfTChOemMNCeNu4YV55k1e9CjlKUELgOLwMyt9kBbxFIOc1h9cJslp ez9hraJ9Dei3LAnGg3G1cJ7Z3Q0i8C27gHMfajMY9xkdmLqQg2CXkgkZjyuLonieAwK4 7M3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IaTN4YD22GrNzsUHO43/JYgxFsHvykeRhdASSy/A3E=; b=J+RQRIV/AXehUY/QvBseRM9e3bI4Gy4PxmcS7n21Ymg25Pgi22Hp3fJual2lVVgw1A Dqk9i8QS7f24QHIIblwjuLv50OGIucYUd25yt/wNgQWnURekkf4/CUk4lMJjOZfmC66r gBb2fLq06sIbwEQiLX26Q4NaY2+ve6zMY4kYb6RfmD/Hbr8PHD32+H0qyhH6pttg8YOq fgrs0TrbyVKnqXiE8Cr8ADK08bncY0ZztDTmkeT6z2BdXwPc+3sEy66lApn5p4InBhz2 lkKjPXSo7tj8NoObpV4uQ4QV3/2iNyafo6rfYsqnLA62njjC8pP/MuAPuGPm1CC+AkPm zpQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fEzKI8yhvNMgV7pS9XVeONnwgiXP/OVh8xnYj5D9rUc8WQ3H0 R9vrWhxNqIkvMAfQ+vGFGn4kVaC2AGk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVKDx64oS12z19xWMwFOZpTmFc4r4nDgs73zgtfU3f1ZSJIGdk1UhpsiMxW0OPY19eS4bSLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c91a:: with SMTP id f26mr10095141wmb.15.1622936852887; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 16:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x3sm12625970wmj.30.2021.06.05.16.47.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Jun 2021 16:47:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.59, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270452 Archived-At: On 05.06.2021 07:23, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I'm fine if you fix this and fine if you leave it. Personally, I've switched to >> fido-mode + fido-vertical-mode which doesn't do the [mplete.el] dance. >> Personally I'm also fine to remove this complexity altogether, even for >> non-vertical Icomplete/Fido, but I think at least Stefan likes it (possibly >> others, but no record thereof). > > I'm not very much attached to the "[mplete.el] dance", FWIW. > I do think it helps cram a fair bit more candidates in the small amount > of space usually available in horizontal icomplete, It's actually disabled in fido-mode, except for the "sole remaining match" case, so we're not really cramming them in. So it's an aesthetic choice at this point. > so I suspect other > users may care, but I'm not one of them because I don't use icomplete > any more (well, I do enable it occasionally, but it's fairly rare). Did you go back to the standard completion UI?