From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:28:04 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <016f01c4bad3$d7d7dad0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: <008d01c4b886$32d07ff0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <417AA9D8.6080600@wyrdrune.com> <68c73b1a04102421311ce5a547@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098737273 5414 80.91.229.6 (25 Oct 2004 20:47:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guy Gascoigne-Piggford , Jason Rumney , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 22:47:39 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMBkg-0002zi-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:47:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBsL-0002Bg-JI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:55:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBsC-0002BE-OU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBsB-0002Ak-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBsB-0002AX-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.114] (helo=av7-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CMBkA-0002ma-2A; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: by av7-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3F6AD37EC6; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:47:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.163]) by av7-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305DB37E48; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:47:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t1o58p90.telia.com [62.20.164.90]) by smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 277DB37E58; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:47:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "Dhruva Krishnamurthy" , "Kim F. Storm" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28943 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28943 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dhruva Krishnamurthy" : For records, I had sent a mail regarding mail-slots. IMO, it uses very : low level (BIOS) communication and hence might be the reason for : bypassing firewall. The link the mail I sent is below: I may be wrong but everything I read about network security suggests that all network traffic goes through network ports. And firewalls are typically watching the ports. - Lennart