From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package-vc support for :files keyword Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:23:14 -0500 Message-ID: <01436d9f-d8eb-9708-08cc-dbfd2848b3fc@alphapapa.net> References: <871qevbhru.fsf@posteo.net> <5f11ccd3-4f04-2f93-6f69-825e0d232944@alphapapa.net> <87ttrqblst.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40346"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, tonyzorman@mailbox.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 19 14:23:42 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qiZlV-000AAs-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:23:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qiZlJ-0003ZM-B4; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qiZlD-0003ZD-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:23:24 -0400 Original-Received: from black.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.19]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qiZlC-0006E0-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:23:23 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|adam@alphapapa.net Original-Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5C35419B7; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a242.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EEB1054152C; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:23:19 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1695126200; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=vdyUoAuxJfYVFtAU1O2r+Q+bWJzf3I8aB0HlOlLMYJ1IIVg2BrrRqLIJ92+2bKlnp8g02/ c1fWcRlHCz0k36WyfGQJ2nk7qLbMWWZMpwy0koFpnL3qcky9X3k4YZNT9wNR+WAM1Yvq6B fy6YzSGfO9COEmPE+3dcG/TDodnrQ2Zi638Cd+z4i2qqDT9AK8/B3qogziRBVKtvr++ZDb nx3YFTIjfrgIIL1V0zzRGCznPlKCQrpT0pu37GQn1gRFT1TRpp7VFwL49cW9k2AWbXEz3n uIgC3svpGr/xy2swtJziCZD9CUdd8gy0zlE2oimVFjB38Y3ejppuFvYmw6MDzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1695126200; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=au02IiGPTvurXHSeJWFYqwL9TwHtXD0REb1U1ePubXA=; b=Ak7bsYnuIxHXi1RPxnuHG8jBfY/Jm9U3pDH/6ZSaa3Zi3HhpeZQKgHoh8bEW9LapkwXXt3 O3Bei1JUwwt5GySUCw/s0eRt2xRzbZ9kyptqDWk8+c6XTHnbkL+5TJmsNjhD9Cuf1Y1OFg 3wl/a2nHwkK5oKq5qINyo+gnxhBy5dP5YxXJpC7S6FPZ31fNTPCTWPv+TfGI+H48a3/u9E 7kNUnKFFTOqX9B6B+kvPgMjy3Ihs2Huec4b9RHQuu6DTfjd7GRyKE1ezHR4spbDUaAxC5M ShigdhKfz6oQMXnFpCIFXz6xhKeEk1JuElNm7QW7PIxTgvmA3ghh5BiqUl95pg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-7c449d4847-7gmzd; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=adam@alphapapa.net X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|adam@alphapapa.net X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|adam@alphapapa.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Abortive-Power: 3cc03548510a1209_1695126200329_1330245481 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1695126200329:2463094740 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1695126200329 Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a242.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.96.239.67 (trex/6.9.1); Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:23:20 +0000 Original-Received: from [10.66.0.178] (unknown [91.193.232.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: adam@alphapapa.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a242.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Rqgml2jT1z39; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:23:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alphapapa.net; s=dreamhost; t=1695126199; bh=au02IiGPTvurXHSeJWFYqwL9TwHtXD0REb1U1ePubXA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HPcfhoQFqx3cMcu2loQ5HDGVLlC7D0XOHUWBKoWo8XvHQxicqMR1jpd+/eAFbP6ms A8J2ixlFE0uz0PzmhX/P2zkg70c7pqjo1fE2CcDFexESx3/WpZhrHu2LkcHz5E7lPO ZDuXD9wzNjDDN8Pmu7yu5DEvoHrcVf41PSm/doO0z1dsOm4v6LY7kUPhrJhdPNM96Z 78e+FuDZQBC7ZyNLiGS1YK+cCkZVkHAoWaOSSuAkUcxDLQJVFaBhgTZD/l/dfUgpvZ vskAJHEiaAs4dJ1/OC4F1M48iOWm9iP5kF/PKZsczEvYK3wptlEFVyWBuRUrhidChk /ab2Q82RKN8hg== Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87ttrqblst.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: neutral client-ip=23.83.212.19; envelope-from=adam@alphapapa.net; helo=black.elm.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.473, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:310753 Archived-At: Hi Philip, On 9/19/23 03:37, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >> Please note out that while `taxy' and `taxy-magit-section' are both >> developed in "taxy.el.git", they are in separate branches, so there is >> no need to build the two packages from a single set of files by >> excluding some files and then the others. > > Oops, I just wrote a quick script that compared URLs but did not check > what :branch they are developed on. > >> I've chosen to keep these packages in the same repo because they are >> so closely related. I'd like to be able to keep this arrangement. > > That is totally fine, would you mind sharing your setup, in case someone > else is interested in this approach as well? I'm not sure what you're asking for, but I'll be glad to share. All I did was create an orphan branch in the same repository and add the "taxy-magit-section.el" and associated files there, as if it were a separate repo. >> Having said that, while I wouldn't personally object to dropping >> support for building multiple packages from a single branch (since I >> don't do it myself), I wouldn't favor doing so, because existing >> packages do, and it would create more work for the authors to have to >> split them up. > > That is the issue, and I certainly don't want to be the one to blame for > breakage, be it for package developers let alone users. > >> Maybe it would be reasonable to make a new policy against building >> multiple packages from a single branch, while "grandfathering" in the >> existing packages that do so, if it would solve a problem for ELPA. > > What do you mean by "grandfathering"? It's an expression; in this context, it would mean to allow the packages that already work this way to continue doing so, while requiring newly submitted packages to only build one package per branch (or repo, depending on the policy).