From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eliminating "changed in Emacs outside of Customize" Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:51:51 +0100 Message-ID: <013001c50a08$52dd0600$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: <00ac01c5096a$cfaf6950$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200502022245.j12MjvW17223@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107446216 7193 80.91.229.6 (3 Feb 2005 15:56:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 16:56:46 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CwjLa-0000vK-00 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:56:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CwjYw-0001dG-0p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:10:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CwjYG-0001SR-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:09:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CwjYB-0001Pm-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:09:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CwjYB-0001OH-BB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.116] (helo=av9-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwjHL-00082e-5l; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: by av9-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5EA5237E58; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:52:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.164]) by av9-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D594437E53; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:52:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t1o58p232.telia.com [62.20.164.232]) by smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A66037E47; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:52:19 +0100 (CET) Original-To: "Luc Teirlinck" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32814 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32814 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luc Teirlinck" > I do not believe that there would be widespread support for splitting > every single *-hook into program-*-hook and user-*-hook, which would > be the easiest way to solve the problem. Thanks for the explanation. But in this case would it not be only the defcustom hooks we consider?