From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: pretest, devel and bug lists Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 13:33:15 -0700 Message-ID: <007201c8c038$e401e490$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211920435 4086 80.91.229.12 (27 May 2008 20:33:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 20:33:55 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Glenn Morris'" , Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 27 22:34:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K15sM-0006zX-Fs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 22:34:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54200 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K15rb-0006sX-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K15rV-0006sH-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K15rT-0006ry-MU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55526 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K15rT-0006rv-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:23735) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K15rP-00055W-5B; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id m4RKXSkI022385; Tue, 27 May 2008 14:33:28 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id m4RC5d5e014593; Tue, 27 May 2008 14:33:28 -0600 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3681317681211920375; Tue, 27 May 2008 13:32:55 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.5.171.3) by bhmail.oracle.com (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 27 May 2008 13:32:54 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AcjAN2+26QNYjwYMS1SGTiEolsjJ+QAAJEPQ X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97828 Archived-At: > If things sent to emacs-pretest-bug are being fed into a bug tracker > and sent to bug-gnu-emacs, then I would say there is no need for > copies to _also_ be sent to emacs-devel. I agree. Bug tracking and bugs discussions should be in a separate mailing list from emacs-devel. If a particular bug thread develops into a development discussion, it can be moved to emacs-devel. (Yes, I know that pretest bugs can often involve development discussions.) > I also don't see the need for tracker control messages to be sent to > bug-gnu-emacs, but I'm less sure about that. I think I disagree. I like everything about Emacs bugs to be sent to the bugs list. But I too am less sure about this.