From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: RE: compilation-next-error - extra `let' binding? Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:49:30 -0800 Message-ID: <006301c86a83$570c67f0$a350908d@us.oracle.com> References: <005c01c86a82$3803b940$a350908d@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202496644 31038 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2008 18:50:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:50:44 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 19:51:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNYJS-0005Zq-Gx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:51:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNYIz-0002I9-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNYIe-00027W-SR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNYIc-00026a-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNYIb-00026S-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNYIb-0003Co-Rn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JNYIb-0006jZ-Au for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNYIY-0003C6-IX for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:09 -0500 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNYIY-0003Bk-5u for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from agmgw1.us.oracle.com (agmgw1.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.212]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id m18Io1uP030620 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:50:02 -0700 Original-Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by agmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id m18AdUSI018709 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:50:01 -0700 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3565382431202496565; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:49:25 -0800 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.80.163) by bhmail.oracle.com (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:49:25 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <005c01c86a82$3803b940$a350908d@us.oracle.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AchqgjeWwxqCfpu8QjOC0vx5fyXvAAAAI2Iw X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88540 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20957 Archived-At: It also looks like the test in the second branch of this `if' could be just (> n 0), for clarity: (if (zerop n) (unless ...) (setq last (nth 2 (car msg))) (if (>= n 0) ; <== Can't be zero here, anyway. (compilation-loop ...) ...))