From: "Lennart Borgman" <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
Cc: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>,
Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>,
Emacs Devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Documentation for custom-file - is not (load custom-file) needed?
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:16:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006101c4dd74$eb9657e0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> (raw)
In-Reply-To: jwvsm6g1r4u.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> >> 2 - custom-set-variables does internally:
> >> (push load-file-name custom-files)
> > Could load-file-name be exchanged with (buffer-file-name) if the user is
> > doing an interactive eval-buffer?
>
> The sky is the limit. Seriously, tho, I don't think we should.
> If the user evaluates a custom-set-variables via M-C-x or somesuch, I
can't
> think of a reason why we should care.
I was thinking of the situation when a user is creating a new "custom-file".
If the user knows that custom-set-variables remember which file it was in it
may be natural to assume that this also happens during eval-defun. I see no
reason why it should not.
- Lennart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-08 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-04 1:53 Documentation for custom-file - is not (load custom-file) needed? Lennart Borgman
2004-12-04 23:35 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-05 21:52 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-06 0:24 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06 14:10 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-07 2:40 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-08 4:40 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-06 2:56 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07 4:23 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-05 15:50 ` John Paul Wallington
2004-12-05 17:07 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-05 17:33 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-05 22:07 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-06 0:46 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06 1:21 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-06 4:02 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06 13:04 ` Stefan
2004-12-06 18:34 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06 18:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-06 21:53 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-07 2:34 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07 9:39 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-12-07 3:27 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07 2:56 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-08 4:40 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-07 3:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07 4:23 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-07 5:39 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-08 0:44 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08 4:35 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-08 17:52 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08 4:42 ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-08 13:27 ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-08 17:52 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08 18:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-08 19:56 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08 20:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-08 22:16 ` Lennart Borgman [this message]
2004-12-08 4:40 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-09 2:20 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-09 2:24 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-09 22:06 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-10 5:54 ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-10 15:51 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-10 17:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-10 18:36 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-10 20:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-11 1:00 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-11 3:38 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-11 3:56 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-11 4:11 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-13 3:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-13 9:01 ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-13 15:55 ` Luc Teirlinck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-13 19:51 Richard Stallman
2004-12-14 0:34 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-14 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-14 1:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-14 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-15 2:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-15 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-16 0:48 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-16 4:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-17 0:54 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-17 5:41 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-17 13:20 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-12-20 10:56 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-21 0:48 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-23 0:53 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-25 15:13 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-26 2:31 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-14 4:14 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-17 15:31 LENNART BORGMAN
2004-12-23 14:07 LENNART BORGMAN
2004-12-23 18:05 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-28 1:06 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-28 4:28 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-28 17:25 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-23 18:34 ` Luc Teirlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='006101c4dd74$eb9657e0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488' \
--to=lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=juri@jurta.org \
--cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).