From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: RE: display-buffer-other-frame - useful? doc string? Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:22:43 -0800 Message-ID: <005601c88277$26abc6d0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <002401c8820f$7d6042c0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205130318 17734 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2008 06:25:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 10 07:25:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYbS9-0003K1-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:25:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYbRb-0002Dp-If for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYbRX-0002Dk-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYbRV-0002DY-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYbRV-0002DV-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYbRU-0004nc-Qb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYbRU-0007iy-IR for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYbRR-0004nA-Hs for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYbRN-0004mb-Rx; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.110]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id m2A6Opce002420; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:24:51 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m2A5gGf3017135; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:24:50 -0600 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3605899901205130230; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:23:50 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.112.116) by bhmail.oracle.com (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:23:49 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AciCddz2LYqkCpZWQIKcHKmeDKTDJgAATTmw In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92007 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21493 Archived-At: > It is certainly wrong to lower the frame. I wonder why that happens. > Is there explicit code to do it, or is it an unwanted side effect? There is explicit code. But see my proposed redefinition.