From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:44:55 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <004b01c4ba23$86b495e0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: <008d01c4b886$32d07ff0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <00d901c4b900$9b774500$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <417C339E.8080406@wyrdrune.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098661522 4918 80.91.229.6 (24 Oct 2004 23:45:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel , "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 01:45:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CLs2r-0003zO-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:45:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLsAT-0005JQ-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLsAM-0005JK-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:52:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLsAM-0005J8-AY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:52:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLsAM-0005J5-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:52:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.107] (helo=av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CLs2h-0002vQ-23 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: by av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4A28237E63; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:44:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.163]) by av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD7637E56; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:44:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t5o58p9.telia.com [195.67.196.9]) by smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E357B37E42; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "Stefan" , "Guy Gascoigne-Piggford" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28869 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28869 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan" To: "Guy Gascoigne-Piggford" Cc: "Kim F. Storm" ; "Lennart Borgman" ; "Emacs Devel" Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 1:36 AM Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 : > Actually I think that it's the other way around. The first server is : > listening and so the second can't bind to the port and so errors out. : : That hasn't been my experience, and disagrees with the comments (and : messages) in the server.el code. Maybe it depends on the underlying OS? I have no idea about that, but I think it could be very frustrating if starting a second instance of Emacs makes the first instance behave differently. The way it works on windows seems best to me. (Though I have never wanted to start a second instance.) - Lennart