From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hourglass - how is it started and ended? Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:54:23 +0100 Message-ID: <003d01c51ca9$f57df2d0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: <001101c51c62$dba84d20$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <01c51c8a$Blat.v2.4$237baee0@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109495586 809 80.91.229.2 (27 Feb 2005 09:13:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 27 10:13:06 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D5KTi-0006YA-40 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:12:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D5Klp-0007Kw-IV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:31:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D5KdW-0007MY-KZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:22:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D5KdH-0006zY-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:22:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D5KdF-0006Mv-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:22:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.107] (helo=av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D5KCn-0003m4-Oj; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: by av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 0B74A38152; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:55:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.163]) by av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0F637E4B; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:55:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t4o58p26.telia.com [195.252.57.26]) by smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1110037E46; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:55:11 +0100 (CET) Original-To: "Eli Zaretskii" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33865 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33865 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eli Zaretskii" > If you don't cancel the timer, it will expire at the wrong moment > (counted since the time it was set by whatever previous activation). Thanks, I see how it is implemented now. I thought of a rather different model. And my initial question was wrong. The hourglass I have seen in Emacs on w32 must have been started in some other way than by start_hourglass.