From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Info: Why is "note" hidden by "see"? Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:37:17 +0100 Message-ID: <003701c52efd$72bf2420$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111509881 14705 80.91.229.2 (22 Mar 2005 16:44:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 22 17:44:41 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDmRu-0007jI-OS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:41:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDmjF-0008DD-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:59:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDmgi-0007Jj-Lp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDmga-0007FS-M9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:56:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDmga-0007Eg-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.10.109] (helo=av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDmNx-0004LR-Ns for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: by av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1038B37EE6; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:37:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.183]) by av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004A437E4D for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:37:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t1o58p79.telia.com [62.20.164.79]) by smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B118537E5A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:37:39 +0100 (CET) Original-To: "Emacs Devel" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34971 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34971 (Sorry for making a new thread, i have deleted the old messages about this issue.) Maybe this is not the time to ask, but I simply do not understand why an overlay is used in the Info buffer to hide "note" and display "see". Why can't the text in the buffer be changed instead? Would not that be better for the search functions? Or does that give some new problems? Is the actual text in Info buffer important in some way?