From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "grischka" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vertical scrollbar error on MS Windows Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:19:23 +0100 Message-ID: <002c01c75aa4$875cf0e0$8144fe91@j4f3n1> References: <001401c7554e$bbd42100$2446fe91@j4f3n1><009401c75611$3782cbe0$351b90d4@j4f3n1> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172607478 22796 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 20:17:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 21:17:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HM8lf-0006GW-EC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:17:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM8lf-00082v-5H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:17:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM7tO-00052r-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:21:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM7tM-00052f-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:21:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM7tM-00052c-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HM7tM-0003QG-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2007 19:21:37 -0000 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19QUVoQVMBQNZpHn0G3IIwsvV9i6laPn+7NiRsOG7 6ENQ== X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:17:02 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66945 Archived-At: > > > > Here is another fix for the scrollbars ... > > > This approach suffers from the same problems. > > Not shure what you mean, works for me. > The other code works as well. But there are problems > in some circumstances. Problems with the other code? May be. > If I understand correctly what you mean, then the Xaw behavior is exactly > what we want. That leaves it to the application to decide whether the > thumb can "slide past the end" or not. Xaw certainly has its nostalgic charme with its own behaviour and design. But, no, I don't think you want Xaw behaviour with windows scrollbars. Not even with GTK scrollbars, really. > A slider that slides past the end is not a problem, really. > You seem to dislike it, could you explain why? Actually I don't know what it means. An end where it can go past is not the end, no? Ah, okay, maybe you see it differently. Such that the slider does not shrink on bottom, but actually slips into some slit in the frame. Is it that? -- grischka