From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Mark Ayers" <n2sami@attbi.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: RE: IRC client for Emacs
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:18:44 -0700
Organization: often equals Disorgainization
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <002601c2426f$c0afe070$2f7de40c@loki>
References: <20020812191028.595435.FMU9022@piglet.prv.splode.com>
Reply-To: <n2sami@attbi.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029205096 30694 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2002 02:18:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 02:18:16 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords: Emacs
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17eRGA-0007yx-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:18:14 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17eReT-0006b9-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:43:21 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eRH3-0002Ck-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:19:09 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eRGj-0002Bm-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:18:49 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eRGh-0002BU-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:18:48 -0400
Original-Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com ([204.127.202.62])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eRGh-0002BP-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:18:47 -0400
Original-Received: from loki ([12.228.125.47]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20020813021847.VMRC221.sccrmhc02.attbi.com@loki>
          for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 02:18:47 +0000
Original-To: <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
In-Reply-To: <20020812191028.595435.FMU9022@piglet.prv.splode.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6495
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6495

Would it be unusual to offer both and allow user choice?

ALA
mail and message

That said user extensibility of ERC is attractive.