From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Release update Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:17:55 -0800 Message-ID: <002201c96493$e7a9ba00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <87abaocmay.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <001901c96489$97132040$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229991490 32370 80.91.229.12 (23 Dec 2008 00:18:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' , 'Chong Yidong' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "'Leo'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 23 01:19:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LEuzP-0002l9-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:19:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEuyD-0001qI-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:17:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEuy9-0001py-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:17:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEuy6-0001pE-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:17:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60787 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEuy6-0001pB-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:17:50 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:33238) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LEuy4-0000si-8v; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:17:48 -0500 Original-Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBN0HIxB004615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:17:19 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt706.oracle.com (acsmt706.oracle.com [141.146.40.84]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBN0HoBo011749; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:17:51 GMT Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.5.135.148) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:17:39 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AclkjZ6NzwsucgczTuKT7eDBmvXDawAAzyHw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: acsmt706.oracle.com [141.146.40.84] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.49502E25.00EF:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107214 Archived-At: > > With my own setup, it takes on average 15-20 seconds for the initial > > frame to appear, and another 10 seconds for my two-frame setup to > > finish. emacs -Q takes 15-20 seconds on average for the frame to > > appear. The command I use is this: runemacs.exe -Q > --debug-init. This > > is on a 1-year-old laptop with 2G RAM and pretty good processors. > > Do you still experience the slowness with the one from: > http://code.google.com/p/emacs-for-windows/? Yes, unfortunately. 18 sec for emacs -Q. But, as I said, the time is variable. Testing only emacs -Q: First time: 18 sec. Second time, < 1 sec. Third time, 16 sec. Fourth time, < 1 sec. Fifth time, < 1 sec. Sixth time, 15 sec. Seventh time, 15 sec. Eighth time, 1 sec. Ninth time, 16 sec. Tenth time, 1 sec That's exactly the behavior I see in Lennart's vanilla builds. It either takes quite a long time or it comes up immediately. I was thinking that it usually takes a long time, but trying now several times in a row, it looks like it's about 50-50. Same thing for Lennart's build. I'm not running anything else at the moment, besides a mail client and Web browser, and during this test no mail went in or out (and no mail polling AFAICT), and I didn't use the browser (static Web page).