From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode as default (WAS: Some developement questions) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 23:37:41 +1200 Message-ID: <001fc136-b693-5c2a-3347-1ab1c9aa2fd2@orcon.net.nz> References: <83k1nxvm5j.fsf@gnu.org> <835zzhv2zs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1536406601 7123 195.159.176.226 (8 Sep 2018 11:36:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:36:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 Cc: hw@adminart.net, spacibba@aol.com, npostavs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 08 13:36:36 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fybXY-0001ky-3z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 13:36:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42178 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fybZe-0005c2-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 07:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fybZ2-0005JE-IC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 07:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fybYx-0005u8-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 07:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-3.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.44]:56514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fybYx-0005pM-9X; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 07:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.107.172.19] (port=37019 helo=[192.168.20.103]) by smtp-3.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fybYb-0006lo-Pd; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 23:37:41 +1200 In-Reply-To: <835zzhv2zs.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-GeoIP: NZ X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 60.234.4.44 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:229488 Archived-At: On 08/09/18 01:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> User options can belong to multiple groups though, can't they? >> Perhaps an initial implementation is as simple as identifying >> such options, adding them to a common group, and linking to that >> group from the splash screen? > > I suggested that in a recent thread, so I'm in favor of identifying > these groups. Oh, very good. I didn't remember it, but perhaps I read that. Were there other particular user options which were mentioned when you first raised this idea? (Do you remember which thread that was?) I feel like this should become a bug report, for tracking purposes. -Phil