From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: RE: 23.0.60; doc string of minibuffer-completing-file-name Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:02:35 -0700 Message-ID: <001d01c8a269$133d7640$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <000a01c8a22b$5bdaf9b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208642570 4096 80.91.229.12 (19 Apr 2008 22:02:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 20 00:03:24 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JnL9Y-00073g-DV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:03:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JnL8t-00034y-Cr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JnL8o-00034j-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JnL8n-00034X-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JnL8n-00034U-Qr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JnL8n-0006Hk-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JnL8n-0008I8-AQ for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JnL8j-0006Gy-II for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JnL8j-0006Ge-7u for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:02:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rgmgw2.us.oracle.com (rgmgw2.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.111]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id m3JM2UVv003415; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:02:30 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by rgmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m3JJf0nT023773; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:02:29 -0600 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3655327951208642541; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:02:21 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.88.148) by bhmail.oracle.com (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:02:21 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AciiZ6JmjypatVOvTiSzSJEpI72dsgAAPLgA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95486 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22070 Archived-At: > > Is that correct? It doesn't seem so, by looking at the C > > code (but I'm no expert on that). > > Indeed, thank you. Fixed. Thanks for fixing it. What about this other part? > > should this variable be documented in the Elisp manual, > > along with minibuffer-completion-(table|predicate|confirm)? > PS: It turns out that sending to both emacs-pretest-bug and > submit@... is a bad idea because replies then also go to both > addresses, and are thus considered as new bug-reports, etc... Then I will send only to whatever M-x report-emacs-bug chooses, as before.