From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: bug tracker "Processed: your mail" mails Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:15:52 -0700 Message-ID: <001901c8fcc0$9a4bfa10$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <000a01c8fca8$dadb2780$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <18593.64398.601456.865257@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218575832 9391 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 21:17:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:17:12 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Glenn Morris'" , "'Emacs developers'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 23:18:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KT1Fc-00082F-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:17:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40356 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KT1Ee-0001oA-R9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KT1Dj-0001Md-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KT1Dh-0001Lp-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34219 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KT1Dh-0001Lk-96 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:32615) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KT1Da-0001cW-0T; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:15:50 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m7CLFevT019420; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:15:40 -0500 Original-Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id m7CDsgC8011539; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:15:39 -0600 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt357.oracle.com with ESMTP id 11441658201218575738; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:15:38 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/69.181.100.12) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:15:36 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <18593.64398.601456.865257@fencepost.gnu.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: Acj8v95iEGpUDV8NRh+rsHhmvCs+YgAACs3w X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102387 Archived-At: > Look, just ignore all these mails, you don't need to read them. > If I want more info I'll ask directly. OK, thanks. That will save a lot of scanning. But my impression is that I will otherwise not be informed of a change in status of a bug I filed. Am I mistaken about that? I would like to know if a bug I file gets closed or is sent to the wishlist (aka /dev/null) or if I need to provide more info. And if users can truly ignore these mails, then it would be good if they didn't receive them. I think you are suggesting the same thing, Glenn, but I'm not sure. Thx. > Is there any chance of these mails being directed to the specially > created emacs-bug-tracker list, as everyone (apart from the > administrator) seems to want? I've been using the tracker extensively, > and have been happily sending these mails to /dev/null for ages. They > just confuse people, as we see.