From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: FW: Minibuf menu when minibuffer is standalone Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:08:42 -0800 Message-ID: <001001c883ab$528a70f0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205262670 28274 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2008 19:11:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:11:10 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Emacs-Devel'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 11 20:11:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZ9rf-0001YQ-3C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:10:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9r6-0000vQ-Kj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9r3-0000v5-HU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:09:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9r2-0000up-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:09:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9r1-0000um-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:09:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ9r1-0006jS-LA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:09:39 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id m2BJ9awV019763 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:09:37 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id m2AF1u6t020382 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:09:36 -0600 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3608154741205262522; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:08:42 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.106.216) by bhmail.oracle.com (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:08:42 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AciDq1IMeiLLusWbQKqTbRT5KCs3rA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92180 Archived-At: Resending. From: Drew Adams Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 8:26 AM Resending, since the release is now out. > From: Drew Adams Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 1:02 PM > Consider as a possible enhancement somehow making the Minibuf > menu-bar menu available also when the minibuffer is in a > standalone frame (frame parameter minibuffer has value `only'). > > Because the minibuffer maps are local maps, when you have a > standalone minibuffer frame, which has no menu-bar, the Minibuf > menu-bar menu is not available anywhere. (The other frames do > not have minibuffers, and their buffers do not have the > minibuffer map as local map.) > > Perhaps menu Minibuf could somehow be made to appear in all > frames that have a menu-bar, whenever the minibuffer is active. > I'm not sure how that might be implemented, because it is good > to keep the current situation of the minibuffer maps being > local to the minibuffer. But if a good implementation could be > found, it would be desirable to have the Minibuf menu available > also for users who have a standalone minibuffer.