From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:37:13 -0800 Message-ID: <000001c8674c$3240ebb0$9eb22382@us.oracle.com> References: <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702CD2B19@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <87prvckb3s.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702D24E40@maileube01.misys.global.ad> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202143131 15676 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2008 16:38:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: "'Marshall, Simon'" , "'Chong Yidong'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 04 17:39:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JM4Lb-0004FX-K3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:39:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JM4L9-000858-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JM4L4-00081x-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JM4L2-0007ya-9v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JM4L2-0007yC-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JM4L1-00067S-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JM4L1-0004sq-Gv for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JM4Ky-00066O-7r for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:31 -0500 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JM4Kx-0005uU-Su for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:28 -0500 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.110]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m14GbVme013180; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:37:32 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m14ENNpO021357; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:37:30 -0700 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt350.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3554912791202143033; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:37:13 -0800 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.158) by bhmail.oracle.com (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:37:13 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702D24E40@maileube01.misys.global.ad> x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AchnQLPhJwFyPDDqT0O1E+ylVpe/MwABD1lgAAFdmUA= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88169 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20869 Archived-At: > Well, the report is pre-21.1 and > the change is post-21.1, so we now have a change in behaviour from a > released version. Did anyone complain about this post 21.1? My report was not only post-21.1; it was near the end of the Emacs 22 development cycle. > I, for one, prefer the 21.1 behaviour for *compilation* buffers. I have no preference for compilation buffers. My report was about grep. > But, I can see that the change is likely better for *grep* buffers. We agree about that. > Perhaps *compilation* should behave differently from *grep* in this > respect? Agreed again. Or perhaps we could have a user option (or two).