From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cus-edit.el Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:49:10 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c516d5$79457f50$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> References: <200502190227.j1J2Rw623778@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108854450 13092 80.91.229.2 (19 Feb 2005 23:07:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 20 00:07:30 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D2dh6-0005Ay-Ar for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:07:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D2dxj-0005SA-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:24:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D2du8-00042a-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:20:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D2du3-00040O-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D2du3-0003qc-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:20:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.9.111] (helo=av4-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D2dRP-0005Ab-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: by av4-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E5F3F37E51; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:51:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.178]) by av4-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D873637E50; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:51:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from sedrcw11488 (t5o58p146.telia.com [195.67.196.146]) by smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A6BF138004; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:51:05 +0100 (CET) Original-To: "Luc Teirlinck" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33638 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33638 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luc Teirlinck" > --- 120,131 ---- > > ;; 6. rogue > > ! ;; There is no standard value. This means that the variable was > ! ;; not defined with defcustom. In newer Emacs versions, you can > ! ;; not create a Custom buffer for such variables using the normal > ! ;; interactive Custom commands. However, such Custom buffers can > ! ;; be created in other ways, for instance, by calling > ! ;; `customize-option' non-interactively. To me your changes seems ok (but maybe I should not comment on the language ;-). But maybe "newer Emacs version" could be more specific so it would be more safe for "ageing"?