From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40280: gnus-cloud doesn't do anything useful Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:14:20 +0000 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <87sgg4qgnd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="17732"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40280@debbugs.gnu.org, David Edmondson To: Mathieu Othacehe Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 16 20:15:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jlG77-0004UK-Ho for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:15:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39430 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlG76-00083e-GX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlG6x-00082G-2R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlG6w-0002p7-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlG6w-0007rU-HG; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 40280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40280.159233127430146 (code B ref 40280); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 18:14:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49573 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlG6U-0007qA-9q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:14:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]:37709) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlG6Q-0007ps-7T for 40280@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:14:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d27so16281182qtg.4 for <40280@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:14:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=yBuHc23MT3z5Nf9XfXnF+hxyQkcSPoBr7aQwNXl8/7w=; b=b9hBX4VIe+PD0Pf6nV3+2mN61fEb3FSQnh+dTO0AkVHbWuqV9s+5dFYDYI6/lmywoY 4lS8OFjdhJvn8K3lQ/0RJbrLXxSw97RU6AdZ3WeyJdD8n5LfAyvgVmr4MpojTzGb0DHZ Jrd0RSBuMsUZw5uer1XmMSGSVBDIV69wM8mFY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=yBuHc23MT3z5Nf9XfXnF+hxyQkcSPoBr7aQwNXl8/7w=; b=DMF2/tK4MKvzQx4voSZoy9CFnMJJr+xsZD77UcvW6hNDtNoQ4bLgFXdcLjuCpPqFi3 PezRFtY1T4r6pflrp8k9Ia3XVkMxnulWmWLx1BnIvsTIcyMopEtdf/aBSq4L2UQQjF/9 sn9eoMvlT4Z/ZztZ2JqQ6LpGOKOKG3/YelUaIFwJu8fFKZh9G7Dj0Xpct/eZmiu6d9Iw NWPWUQ9Y7EVtGzSIW4LsKuy1mTCOIOV03eQYGgShjTfU7YWWRW1Q7fbBq+RnA2UX5sNY g+1eQ1n0HvNYk3ruazGGY2ojhOVWYdOPAkAKeboceaBk2OC21wSexw7KAFFIc5O9Go5k Y7iA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kmr5RaebIjBA4FaiPGHbVF0clCFAZi+npK3G5mpUCZUp33SOl 3nBdD9zTXi0E0y8ZWysSzk3Row== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAZ97pGHJbwJPV8oXuJoHCxb4vgNIGTDTcEaV+mfXKZAzUQBWoccghv+FYv58FnGUVfMrb6A== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:768b:: with SMTP id g11mr23522009qtr.249.1592331264698; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from flea (c-76-28-41-155.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [76.28.41.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h5sm14950277qkk.108.2020.06.16.11.14.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:14:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:41:29 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182037 Archived-At: On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:41:29 +0000 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Wed, 13 May 2020 12:21:42 +0200 Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >>> Looking at how `newer' is calculated, it compares the group timestamp >>> from the gnus-cloud message with the current time. It's not clear to me >>> how that test is ever going to return `nil', unless I have a version of >>> emacs running somewhere in the future that updates gnus-cloud. MO> I share the same conclusions on 26.3, the downloaded message is always MO> older than current time, and nothing happens. MO> The patch you are proposing fixes gnus cloud update for me. TZ> I agree this is a problem and agree with David's patch. TZ> I've pushed the patch to branch scratch/tzz/dme/bug-40280-gnus-cloud-newest TZ> I'll merge it into master and adjust any docs needed if I can get a TZ> second review please :) David, Mathieu: The patch and commit message looked good so I've pushed this. Please confirm the fix works well for you and I'll close the bug. Thanks Ted