From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7302: vcdiff using "sccs get" rather than "get" breaks bitkeeper usage. Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:26:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300171038 17440 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2011 06:37:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7302@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 15 07:37:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzNsU-0002n9-BX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:37:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzNsS-00050Z-PF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55146 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzNsL-00050M-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzNsJ-0004wu-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzNsJ-0004wo-N0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:36:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzNig-0006zX-IN; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7302 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 7302-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7302.130017037426796 (code B ref 7302); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7302) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2011 06:26:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzNht-0006y9-Jh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzNhr-0006xx-MM for 7302@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48220) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzNhk-0006gC-PX; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:26:05 -0400 X-Spook: Plame COSCO Etacs spy Lexis-Nexis AIEWS MD5 passwd X-Ran: 9B{E,Xc6J?!s;jNiA@6E&#FBm//8\x;qnxwF;f`Qk=bEWK"OPteFcb8rs}dva0`S(Zdm/k X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Paul Bristow's message of "Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:44:34 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:27:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45009 Archived-At: Paul Bristow wrote: > I have tried that patch and can confirm that it works for me. [...] > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Monnier [mailto:monnier@iro.umontreal.ca] [...] > Can you confirm that the patch below works for you? I don't think this was ever installed; would you like to install it and close this report?