From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8219: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:09:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877hc5bfqy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <838vwlto85.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrk4soee.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300037861 30658 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2011 17:37:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8219@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 18:37:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PypE6-0005g6-UE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:37:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54424 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PypE1-0001mA-AL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45891 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PypDu-0001l2-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PypDt-0003WE-Jn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PypDt-0003W8-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pyonr-00074E-UB; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:10:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:10:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8219 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8219-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8219.130003619327147 (code B ref 8219); Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:10:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8219) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2011 17:09:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pyong-00073o-Kh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pyonf-00073d-3K for 8219@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PyonZ-0007S2-Hc; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:09:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:30:59 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:10:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44972 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > I think we should do away with the BUF_BEGV and related macros. Let the > code in buffer.c manipulate the buffer->begv members directly; and the > usage in other parts of Emacs can be replaced with buf_begv() functions > that will update begv if necessary, and return the corrected result. Or rather, these functions should consult the pt_marker, begv_marker and zv_marker markers instead of accessing begv etc directly.