From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#4789: use bootstrap-emacs to build emacs/leim directory,
	load emacs/leim/leim-list.el to loadup.el
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:01:01 -0400
Message-ID: <yxqtyakqg9u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200911061649.nA6GnhUq027369@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>
	<m3r55uuuk5.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <55y6026rpt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3tyamqa2f.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <t3aacdn6el.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3sjq5bu2t.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <79pql88pwu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310968954 12320 80.91.229.12 (18 Jul 2011 06:02:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:02:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, 4789@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 18 08:02:30 2011
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1QiguT-0005d0-VG
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:02:30 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43953 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1QiguS-0002pt-UD
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:02:28 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55852)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Qigu7-0002oW-6X
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:02:11 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Qigu2-0008UO-Ax
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:02:07 -0400
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44326)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Qigu2-0008UJ-7I
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:02:02 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Qigu1-0000z8-P2; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:02:01 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:02:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.4789.B4789.13109688693722@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug
Original-Received: via spool by 4789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4789.13109688693722
	(code B ref 4789); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:02:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at 4789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2011 06:01:09 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1QigtB-0000xz-3z
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:01:09 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <dann@gnu.org>) id 1Qigt9-0000xo-Ju
	for 4789@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:01:08 -0400
Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dann@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qigt3-0007d9-1n; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:01:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <79pql88pwu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of
	"Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:10:09 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:02:01 -0400
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49382
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/49382>

Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> Right.  Was there any consensus that dumping with leim-list would be a
>> good idea?  I read the thread, and I didn't really see any conclusions.
>
> Don't know. FWIW, I think leim/leim-list should be dumped (and therefore
> would need to be built with bootstrap-emacs), and normal-top-level

Or just check in the generated leim-list.el, it almost never changes.
We do something similar with ldefs-boot.el...