From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9948: valgrind warning: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in redisplay_window Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:30:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83y5vwlujs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320363103 19086 80.91.229.12 (3 Nov 2011 23:31:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 23:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9948@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 04 00:31:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6kx-0001EB-V4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:31:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43686 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6kx-0007m7-IF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:31:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6ku-0007ls-SU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:31:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6kt-0004TO-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6kt-0004TG-Bm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6nK-0006pR-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9948 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9948-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9948.132036321126209 (code B ref 9948); Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9948) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2011 23:33:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6mo-0006oe-BR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6ml-0006oX-U8 for 9948@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:33:28 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6kK-0001T5-0w; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:30:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83y5vwlujs.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:17:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:34:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53493 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Dan Nicolaescu >> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:55:03 -0400 >> >> aggressive = >> scrolling_up >> ? BVAR (current_buffer, scroll_up_aggressively) >> : BVAR (current_buffer, scroll_down_aggressively); >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> This one > > How can this be uninitialized? This is a buffer-local value of a > variable that is initialized to nil on buffer.c. The line might be incorrect, are all the variables in that expression initialized correctly?