From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v" Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:20:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83eii510po.fsf@gnu.org> <834oj01t4c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272223583 21754 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2010 19:26:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6028@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 25 21:26:21 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O67Sp-0001bw-Jf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:26:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59756 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O67Sh-0002hw-HW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O67Sd-0002hq-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57159 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O67Sb-0002hi-3S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O67SN-0006i6-0C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O67SM-0006i2-Uv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:25:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O67O1-0007dR-OW; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6028 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6028-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6028.127222325929343 (code B ref 6028); Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6028) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2010 19:20:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O67Ny-0007dD-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O67Nw-0007d7-U1 for 6028@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O67Ns-0000MZ-Dt; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:20:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun\, 25 Apr 2010 09\:19\:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:21:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:36501 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> I think VC should not display this message if the backend is not a >>> locking VCS. >> FWIW I agree. I think this was discussed on the list a few times, but >> I don't remember the conclusion.... > > Yes. Especially since this message was there to help the transition > away from C-x C-q to C-x v v for vc-next-action. > > Since this change was made for Emacs-22, I think we can simply drop this > message altogether for Emacs-24. IMHO the message still makes sense for RCS (and similar systems) where editing files requires an explicit checkout operation.