From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1482: cleanup: term.c dead code Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:57:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200812030633.mB36XjrI024295@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310320727 16151 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2011 17:58:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 1482@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 10 19:58:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyHA-0001k4-J4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:58:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53106 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyH9-0003P1-PX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38447) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyGd-0003LO-T7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyGZ-0005ew-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyGZ-0005es-RA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyGZ-0000K3-2d; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:58:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1482 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1482-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1482.13103206821235 (code B ref 1482); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1482) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2011 17:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyGW-0000Jp-U5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyGV-0000Jd-8T for 1482@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfyGQ-0006ix-Aq; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:57:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:26:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:58:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48497 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > >>> if (!strcmp (terminal_type, "supdup")) > > RFC734 > >>> || !strcmp (terminal_type, "perq")) > > http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/perq/PERQ_Brochure.pdf Thank you! Then it's quite safe to get rid of these. They are so old and obscure that they can't have a significant number of users (If they didn't make it to /etc/termcap in the '80s/'90's it means they were not used much). We stopped supporting a lot of old systems a number of years ago, so IMO these should go the same way.