From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16573: 24.3; Auctex (11.87.2) in Elpa issues hundreds of warnings on compile Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:07:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a9ee8u1y.fsf@thinkpad-t61.fritz.box> <87ppn9nbn4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391069344 14940 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2014 08:09:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Mos=C3=A8?= Giordano , Neil Jackson , 16573@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 30 09:09:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mgP-0003Rb-83 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:09:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mgO-0001q7-OY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:09:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mgL-0001oo-0O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mgJ-0002Uq-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mgH-0002Tz-Rt; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:09:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mgH-0000KV-JJ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-auctex@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16573 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,auctex X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16573-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16573.13910692841193 (code B ref 16573); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2014 08:08:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mfL-0000JB-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mfJ-0000It-SN for 16573@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8mfH-0002le-MH; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:07:59 -0500 X-Spook: jihad clones UFO JPL STARLAN Israel FSF brigand X-Ran: $!s4)+"/0f(*aJ+P%cTVcfu![>#V0_*Ga($r?LN;4n!zFJk^|cFi1ybjn.~!dt=~<=:G=+ X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87ppn9nbn4.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:59:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84246 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn wrote: >> Personally I think this is bad practice. > > Why? Well, what if you make a typo and use a function that is really undefined? > As said, all those style files use LaTeX-* and TeX-* vars and > functions defined by AUCTeX's core. However, the style files can't be > required individually, but AUCTeX itself loads them dynamically > depending on the \usepackages and \documentclass you use in your LaTeX > document. Why can't the style files require whatever AUCTeX files they need? > Well, AUCTeX releases have a (setq byte-compile-warnings nil) in a > custom lpath.el that's used when byte-compiling anyway. Which makes this whole exercise rather laughable, doesn't it? "All releases must ship with no warnings." "Job done!"