From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:58:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ionxaloa.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <53A3D1F8.3070306@cs.ucla.edu> <53A48FF2.9000805@cs.ucla.edu> <53A50002.3070705@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403380816 14265 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2014 20:00:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 20:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Manoj Srivastava , Paul Eggert , 17806@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 21 22:00:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRSL-0000nq-AP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:00:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46283 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRSK-0001Ni-Ue for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRSH-0001ME-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRSH-0000gw-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36987) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRSG-0000gd-W1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRSG-0002IO-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:00:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 20:00:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17806 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17806-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17806.14033807438713 (code B ref 17806); Sat, 21 Jun 2014 20:00:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2014 19:59:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRRG-0002GS-NG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:56147 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRRE-0002G3-8E for 17806@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyRRC-00010h-V0; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:58:59 -0400 X-Spook: BCCI Becker INSCOM Leuken-Baden PET Venezuela Bush Wired X-Ran: yC(:m2T?bXH)3<:oBd8gN;L#>y\Onw6=z"#9cT0?23<]N5@ (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Sat, 21 Jun 2014 07:46:10 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90648 Archived-At: Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Well, this is considered experimental and known for its controversial results [...] > After all, --enable-link-time-optimization is not enabled by default > (and never should be), users aren't enforced to enable it - so I don't > see a problem here; INSTALL may warn about potentially unstable > results of using this option. I do not feel that the Emacs's documentation reflects the above. People have already suggested enabling this option by default: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13834 As it stands, I think people just see "optimization == better".