unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>
To: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
Cc: robertstephenboyer@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	69480@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#69480: Emacs Lisp needs, for its great 'native-compile', 'declare' and 'the' for fixnums and arrays.
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:07:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yp1plwe2gg5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y1b2t5wx.fsf@gmx.net> (Stephen Berman's message of "Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:53:18 +0100")

Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> writes:

> On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 15:41:24 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
>>> Cc: acorallo@gnu.org,  bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org,  robertstephenboyer@gmail.com,
>>>   69480@debbugs.gnu.org
>>> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:07:50 +0100
>>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:45:39 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> It's still slower with native compilation than with byte compilation on
>>> >> my machine, unlike on yours.  Do you have any idea why?
>>> >
>>> > Maybe your system takes time to allocate memory?  This program
>>> > allocates almost 850MB of memory on my system, so maybe yours starts
>>> > paging?
>>>
>>> I see a similar allocation, but I have 16 GB of RAM (~12 of which were
>>> free when I ran the benchmark), so I think that shouldn't be an issue.
>>>
>>> > Anyway, profiling could give some hints.
>>>
>>> That says almost all memory and CPU are consumed by `build-sieve':
>>
>> This is skewed, use cpu profiling instead of "memory" profiling.
>
> Ah, ok.
>
>>> But I don't see how that bears on the difference between native and byte
>>> compilation in my timings versus yours and Andrea's.
>>
>> My suggestion was to compare profiles in the byte-compiled and
>> native-compiled cases.
>>
>> Btw, are you running both cases in the same session?  If so, don't:
>> restart Emacs and run the other case instead.
>
> Ok, I've now done that.  Here's the report for the run with native
> compilation:
>
>        12599  95% - command-execute
>        12487  95%  - funcall-interactively
>        12486  95%   - eval-expression
>        12485  95%    - #<compiled -0x5db3e1955cb81d1>
>        12485  95%     - #<compiled -0x8a5cf032951a0fe>
>        12480  95%      - eval
>        12480  95%       - progn
>        12367  94%        - benchmark-call
>        12367  94%         - #<lambda 0x8c97b8cb7bd82>
>        12367  94%            build-sieve
>          113   0%        - emacs-lisp-native-compile-and-load
>          113   0%         - emacs-lisp-native-compile
>          113   0%          - native-compile

IIUC this is profiling the native compilation itself.

BTW I'd suggest the profile is done with perf (and running batch).

Given you see on your machine similar times for native and byte compiled
the expected outcome should be tha tthe time is spent in some C routine
of our core.

Best Regards

  Andrea





  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29 19:40 bug#69480: Emacs Lisp needs, for its great 'native-compile', 'declare' and 'the' for fixnums and arrays Robert Boyer
2024-02-29 20:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-29 20:54   ` Robert Boyer
2024-02-29 22:10     ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01  6:45     ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-29 21:04   ` Robert Boyer
2024-03-01 11:28   ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01 12:18     ` Andrea Corallo
2024-03-01 12:33       ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01 12:45         ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-01 13:07           ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01 13:41             ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-01 13:53               ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01 14:07                 ` Andrea Corallo [this message]
2024-03-01 14:35                   ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01 16:10                     ` Andrea Corallo
2024-03-01 19:36                       ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01 16:34                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-01 19:36                   ` Stephen Berman via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-03-01 12:40       ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-03-01 12:34     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yp1plwe2gg5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=acorallo@gnu.org \
    --cc=69480@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=robertstephenboyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephen.berman@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).