From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11068: Acknowledgement (24.0.94; Face-remapped background does not extend to end of window) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:33:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1BE52A40-0403-433F-8164-DFDBD6771F80@gmail.com> <37D73617-CEBF-43BD-BE92-ADAAD2CA30A5@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332452060 26933 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2012 21:34:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11068@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Andrus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 22 22:34:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SApeD-0005qG-IW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:34:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55556 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SApeC-0001zm-W8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SApeA-0001zd-P7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SApe9-0000Pp-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SApe9-0000Pl-6Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAq7x-00030a-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:05:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11068.133245384811483 (code B ref 11068); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2012 22:04:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAq75-0002zA-SS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAq74-0002z3-4w for 11068@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SApdD-0006yx-LU; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:33:15 -0400 X-Spook: World Trade Center SRI red noise Marxist NWO EuroFed X-Ran: +VLXu^Dz>C3@DNQX#8MZ*q2YUgjehCRt+%|zxVZ[-wL'rNFzP*_Vrd=^cB7ErP7jL6yfy< X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <37D73617-CEBF-43BD-BE92-ADAAD2CA30A5@gmail.com> (Ivan Andrus's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:18:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57987 Archived-At: Ivan Andrus wrote: > Sorry, somehow this got sent twice. #11069 is a duplicate of this (or vice versa). No problem, I removed #11069.