From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40280: gnus-cloud doesn't do anything useful Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:41:29 +0000 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <87sgg4qgnd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="126460"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40280@debbugs.gnu.org, David Edmondson To: Mathieu Othacehe Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 09 19:13:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jihoR-000Wnu-1K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:13:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40572 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jihoP-0003Kp-SH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:13:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jihK6-000713-Bp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jihK6-0003iv-07 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jihK5-0005ov-RS; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 40280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40280.159172089922338 (code B ref 40280); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2020 16:41:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jihJj-0005oE-Hj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:36994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jihJh-0005nw-Fo for 40280@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:41:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d27so18132536qtg.4 for <40280@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:41:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=gO/T2KNFfYtk4mWRwsfcAVAJoUExQXs4SUnzCFv0I8E=; b=LRz3Wj6yrcnjPOzaFuwPEcB9dFLWyRFOB+o4rrtVVqkqhehW/HTO7u+FdbLgqRrq/I Xr/8myhRx+KDVstmTHk0sbYHynq88KZtQ2UYYcz3yzlTW3HELtUSkhFqP5WNWIGTQZhg 8qZKB3EO+jm8IjG8akg83EZIDAt0yrL2akG0w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=gO/T2KNFfYtk4mWRwsfcAVAJoUExQXs4SUnzCFv0I8E=; b=oT/etQStIIvnQMRQYHsVc4Wfct5eWbgcqul0CT27nSUbfYeREcwtctfDmVYFtkvmLj Ot+2QJukty+NdVeR2krJQlc3QambIE+ZONWJnebn2VDNWlqsqPUg5MSo1nyL+Ew7IloU px3pGdO76a0hzNfLrWu+Rvh/oolIYXAJjevR9hdk2EuS+5dEgsZ4FF9ie33lUfgVT06w XVWw/iNpJi2Qo0F2jyI1+hRKdqTJyhPbiuVcYu1RilF9J61J9vljDkT3ruqVqLvcPQYR mB0kUG4SxtJOD7tfUlBbJI72friLcARa4Y0tuL9s1kcV2vMuH7+pD3GsejWxz7tQOxjY g7fA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nxF5531OtX/6j2Tv8tkubLBDGxXtPBbNSLBvbR1en7z/ywdpp iqYxgGr8TyfLRRjDGWGdfom98fa7VaM7wA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykEOCT1JUKbbK0tPXnjosq/zEHW5XQdNX6sox3BTRlRHbKzFQO8szCSvwySY1XGj4p7JaZhQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7303:: with SMTP id x3mr11514908qto.44.1591720891394; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from flea (c-76-28-41-155.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [76.28.41.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm10275156qto.0.2020.06.09.09.41.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:41:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87sgg4qgnd.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Wed, 13 May 2020 12:21:42 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181794 Archived-At: On Wed, 13 May 2020 12:21:42 +0200 Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >> Looking at how `newer' is calculated, it compares the group timestamp >> from the gnus-cloud message with the current time. It's not clear to me >> how that test is ever going to return `nil', unless I have a version of >> emacs running somewhere in the future that updates gnus-cloud. MO> I share the same conclusions on 26.3, the downloaded message is always MO> older than current time, and nothing happens. MO> The patch you are proposing fixes gnus cloud update for me. I agree this is a problem and agree with David's patch. I've pushed the patch to branch scratch/tzz/dme/bug-40280-gnus-cloud-newest I'll merge it into master and adjust any docs needed if I can get a second review please :) David, thank you very much for contributing the fix. Ted