From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42265: 28.0.50; different user experience with/out native-comp Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:40:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87sge2urhu.fsf@no.workgroup> <87fta2njpu.fsf@no.workgroup> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13175"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 42265@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregor Zattler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 08 17:41:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCC7-0003L1-5L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 17:41:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42810 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCC6-0003sA-82 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCBy-0003rm-O5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCBy-0006cu-E4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCBy-00077V-DJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42265 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 42265-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42265.159422284427337 (code B ref 42265); Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42265) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2020 15:40:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCBg-00076r-Au for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:40:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:54156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCBd-00076h-2R for 42265@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:40:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 068FebOr012040; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:40:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sdf.org; s=default; t=1594222839; bh=NWlH4F4Z9AuH8EiQk5FAXJcrJ3lA9SN4WYRgiA4iNFE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=aD7bXqWpsSQ2lDJPTJtfMm66tRkHXL4jRoFfKmHWvo/4d/Uc6GutpF20h8Prfi1WF Ro6Yf5vv4xD+MbW4StzcIMzaR2QWaoh6SpmlYK3hWjvwIc7cq1X3pBqszLup0Qa0f6 7ePgn+fuiHDvItm/kJPAtFSn5UshJnOGYsWRKbfU= In-Reply-To: <87fta2njpu.fsf@no.workgroup> (Gregor Zattler's message of "Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:51:25 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182844 Archived-At: Gregor Zattler writes: >> Just a question to understand where to start investigating, have you >> tried compiling without NATIVE_FAST_BOOT and see if it makes a >> difference? > > with --with-nativecomp but without NATIVE_FAST_BOOT=1 ? > > No. Yes, I asked that because since the compilation got vastly faster I rarely if ever used NATIVE_FAST_BOOT. > But I did use it long enough and restartet emacs > several times, so all the eln files could have been > compiled. Actually I realized the problem over a week ago > and used emacs anyway for most of the time but redid the > test with the two builds yesterday and today. > > Is this allready sufficient or should I give it a try > with --with-nativecomp but without NATIVE_FAST_BOOT=1 ? > > Ciao, > -- > Gregor No problem, I want to finish the branch I'm cooking-up, most likely this weekend I'll move into this issue. In case I do not manage to reproduce I'll ask you some more info but should be reproducible. Ciao! Andrea -- akrl@sdf.org