From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45056: 28.0.50; lexical-let doesn't work with returned closures on nativecomp Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:06:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87h7p05dax.fsf@everybody.org> <216496280.161579.1607203268073.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <1009119049.161679.1607205441220.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18497"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , 45056@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Mark A. Hershberger" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 23:07:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klfi6-0004gx-I3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 23:07:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39408 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klfi5-0006Ee-1h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:07:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klfhr-0006ER-3y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klfhm-0000qF-BN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klfhm-00069W-5Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45056 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45056-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45056.160720602023642 (code B ref 45056); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45056) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2020 22:07:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klfhj-00069G-NZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:06:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:53414) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klfhh-000698-Mv for 45056@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 0B5M6u1J026017; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:06:56 GMT In-Reply-To: <1009119049.161679.1607205441220.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> (Mark A. Hershberger's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:57:21 -0800 (PST)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195060 Archived-At: "Mark A. Hershberger" writes: > On Dec 5, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Mark A. Hershberger mah@nichework.com wrote: > >>> have you checked if this behavior is common to the non native build? >> >> I can compile a non-native build and verify that the problem goes away. I'll >> report back when it is done. > > Compiled a non-native emacs and it did not exhibit this bug. Hi Mark thanks for checking. could you provide a reproducer I can load and run possibly with -batch? Thanks Andrea