From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54698: non-recursive GC marking [PATCH] Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 15:44:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5A577100-75CE-4C9E-A7DA-02B917662AF5@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3635"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 54698@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 17:45:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nbOtR-0000jU-V9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 17:45:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nbOtQ-00086Y-Kc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 11:45:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nbOt4-0007zu-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 11:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nbOt4-0008MU-05 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 11:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbOt3-0002uI-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 11:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 15:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54698 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 54698-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54698.164908707711115 (code B ref 54698); Mon, 04 Apr 2022 15:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54698) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2022 15:44:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52717 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbOsf-0002tD-Je for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 11:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:51247) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbOsd-0002t2-NZ for 54698@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 11:44:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 234FiWL3008013 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 4 Apr 2022 15:44:32 GMT In-Reply-To: ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:39:58 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:229414 Archived-At: Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd writes: > 4 apr. 2022 kl. 16.32 skrev Andrea Corallo : > >> do you have any other performance measure for cases different than the >> one mentioned? > > Well, there is the usual collection of special-purpose benchmarks, and > I also timed the GC after a precise set of interactions involving > scrolling through xdisp.c and typecore.ml, as well as running > magit. And ran Relint, and a few more things I can't remember. The > numbers were all largely consistent, but I encourage you to run your > fav workload. > > Anything particular on your mind? We have some benchmarks in elisp-benchmarks that is GC bounded (IIRC nbody at least), I guess would be worth running. Thanks Andrea