From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57627: 29.0.50; [native-compilation] cl-loaddefs.el recompiled on startup Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 12:57:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87bkrsr1g2.fsf@gnus.org> <875yi0qz5b.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfl4ihfo.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtbcp774.fsf@gnus.org> <877d2e5ba1.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26760"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: germanp82@hotmail.com, 57627@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 09 14:58:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWdaM-0006lc-DZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:58:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWdaL-0005y8-DU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 08:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWda6-0005uQ-T1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 08:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWda6-0003NR-KN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 08:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWda6-0007fO-F2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 08:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 12:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57627 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57627-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57627.166272826329432 (code B ref 57627); Fri, 09 Sep 2022 12:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57627) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2022 12:57:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWdZn-0007ed-2X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 08:57:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:51252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWdZk-0007eU-Ip for 57627@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 08:57:41 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 289Cvb3C026561 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 9 Sep 2022 12:57:39 GMT In-Reply-To: <877d2e5ba1.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:57:26 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241972 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> Yeah I think we should probably check directly in 'maybe_swap_for_eln' >> and if the cookie is present just return (if that works). > > It would require reading the .el file in the main Emacs before forking > off the sub-Emacs, I guess? So it'd be slightly slower in general... > > But I guess there's no way around that. Hi Lars, I'm not sure, shouldn't the cookie already be present in the bytecode? Andrea