From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46670: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] possible miscompilation affecting lsp-mode Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:06:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a6ry46uc.fsf@collares.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46670@debbugs.gnu.org, Mauricio Collares To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 11:07:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lEr4n-0000o4-CV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:07:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45920 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEr4m-0001T5-B7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEr4Q-0001Sk-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50098) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEr4P-0006KF-Sf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEr4P-0002sv-NA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:07:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46670 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46670-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46670.161416119411053 (code B ref 46670); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46670) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 10:06:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEr3x-0002sD-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:06:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:58729) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEr3v-0002s5-RK for 46670@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:06:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11OA6OU2013444 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:06:24 GMT In-Reply-To: (Pip Cet's message of "Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:46:18 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200712 Archived-At: Pip Cet writes: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:42 AM Andrea Corallo wrote: >> (assume #(mvar 22593374 2 (not (integer 3 3))) (not #(mvar 22590962 2 (integer 3 3)))) > > If that doesn't mean "the variable in slot 2 is not equal to the > variable in slot 2", we desperately need to work on the LIMPLE > syntax... Honestly I think would be fair from your side to first try to understand how it works before criticizing it or submitting untested patches. Indeed I'm happy to answer as I've explained what this means in my previous mail. And I've to say, not everything that's not working as you'd expect at first glance is broken by definition, this is just not a very good collaborative approach :/ Andrea