From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47024: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Warnings from async compilations truncated Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:50:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83sg54p6cl.fsf@gnu.org> <83im5zpu6p.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1859"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 47024@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 10 07:51:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJsge-0000MT-Gn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:51:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJsgd-0006oL-Ij for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:51:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJsgQ-0006oE-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJsgP-0003PT-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJsgP-0000tv-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47024 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47024-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47024.16153590213410 (code B ref 47024); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47024) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 06:50:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJsfl-0000sw-A8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:50:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:56668) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJsfj-0000sm-3K for 47024@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:50:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12A6oFQb005940 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:50:16 GMT In-Reply-To: <83im5zpu6p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2021 05:24:30 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201961 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: 47024@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 20:37:57 +0000 >> >> > Warning (comp): seq.el:396:16: Warning: `seq-contains' is an obsolete generic function (as of Disable showing Disable logging >> > >> > Note the truncation after "(as of". >> > >> > Why does this happen? can it be fixed? >> >> ATM we capture each Warning (or error) with the following regexp: >> "^.*+?\\(?:Error\\|Warning\\): .*$" >> >> So I expect we match the full line (if is a multi line diagnostic we'll >> loose what's following). > > The message comes from a sub-process, right? Yes > Could it be that we > match prematurely, when only part of the text was received? That's possible, just before using the regexp we call `accept-process-output' on the process, I thought this was sufficient to handle the case but I'm no expert into this area. Andrea