From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40653: 28.0.50; (fset 'yes-or-no-p 'y-or-n-p) has no effect in native-comp branch Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:26:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8d269738-b506-0d33-21a1-01d0e65bb432@sebastian-sturm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="6036"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40653@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Sturm Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 17 13:27:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP9L-0001Qf-8d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 13:27:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP9K-0007IT-BK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP9D-0007IF-CE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP9C-0005uO-FI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP9C-0005uG-C8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP9C-0005Vc-9t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40653 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40653-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40653.158712278621134 (code B ref 40653); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40653) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2020 11:26:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP8c-0005Un-FF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:26:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:49424) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPP8X-0005Ub-W1 for 40653@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:26:26 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 03HBQJdL015750 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:26:20 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 03HBQJl4019850; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:26:19 GMT In-Reply-To: <8d269738-b506-0d33-21a1-01d0e65bb432@sebastian-sturm.de> (Sebastian Sturm's message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:14:47 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:178504 Archived-At: Sebastian Sturm writes: > sorry for being a moron, I had used `counsel-describe-function` > instead of plain `describe-function` (which indeed shows the function > as natively compiled). I thought I had used > `counsel-describe-function` before, but I'm probably mistaken. No issue, thanks for reporting. Andrea -- akrl@sdf.org