From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41242: Port feature/native-comp to Windows Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:58:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <834ksi60zn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="84036"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 41242@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas =?UTF-8?Q?B=C3=A9rtolo?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 14 21:59:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZK0j-000Lm4-67 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:59:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44130 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZK0i-0005rN-6N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZK0T-0005qB-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZK0T-00087O-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZK0T-0002qm-LZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41242 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41242-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41242.158948629310851 (code B ref 41242); Thu, 14 May 2020 19:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41242) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2020 19:58:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34973 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZJzg-0002ow-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:57696) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZJzd-0002oj-MO for 41242@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:58:12 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 04EJw8RZ017204 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Thu, 14 May 2020 19:58:08 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 04EJw8xw022615; Thu, 14 May 2020 19:58:08 GMT In-Reply-To: ("Nicolas =?UTF-8?Q?B=C3=A9rtolo?="'s message of "Thu, 14 May 2020 16:48:06 -0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180263 Archived-At: Nicolas B=C3=A9rtolo writes: >> As you said the problem is to decide who has the duty to remove the file >> at last. If each Emacs deposes a file says .foo.eln-pidxxx for the >> whole time is using foo.eln should be easy for the last Emacs to >> understand it is really the last and has to do the clean-up in the case >> foo.eln was renamed in foo.eln*whatever > > That file would be create when opening foo.eln, but when > Emacs is closing we don't know what file it refers to: > - foo.eln > - foo.eln.old > - foo.eln.old2 > - foo.eln.oldN > > These last files could be created if foo.eln.old exists at the time of re= naming. Yes, but I think we could say: the last Emacs closing that used any file that was (at a certain point in life) foo.eln removes all the old foo.eln.* If is the last using any of the foo.eln* it can do that safely no? --=20 akrl@sdf.org