From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 20:26:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qoj9zv.fsf@gnu.org> <83im68j963.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuprhur0.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8fxyafx.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7lpy7b7.fsf@gnu.org> <83blbxxwuj.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rgwdmr.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qkunpl.fsf@gnu.org> <838s70ujpp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33823"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 06 21:27:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lIdW1-0008gD-O8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 21:27:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIdW0-0003sD-DA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIdVt-0003s0-Uk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIdVt-00044o-NL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIdVt-0001BT-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:27:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 20:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.16150624204545 (code B ref 46256); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 20:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 20:27:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38433 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIdVs-0001BE-BZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:27:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:56082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIdVj-0001Ax-EW for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:26:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 126KQoqB024389 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 6 Mar 2021 20:26:50 GMT In-Reply-To: <838s70ujpp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 06 Mar 2021 22:10:26 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201687 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com >> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 19:21:26 +0000 >> >> >> The reproducer file is a file that is meant to recreate the same >> >> libgccjit IR and attempt a compilation with that. In practice it calls >> >> the same functions we call at the interface with libgccjit describing >> >> the code we want to compile and attempt to perform a compilation. >> > >> > But any issues caused by actually writing the reproducer to a disk >> > file, like text-mode conversions and quirks, aren't relevant, right? >> >> Yes that's correct, but unless the C compiler can't parse correctly this >> file it should work. Do you think this is the case? > > No, I don't. But I could try removing those funny characters, if you > think it would help. Can I remove any characters from those strings > without introducing unrelated problems? I think it should not introduce problems but I expect it not to help, sorry I don't have a certain answers for these, you might want try if you like and it's quick. Thanks Andrea