From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53497: 29.0.50; native-compile after restarting Emacs Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 07:40:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86lez5zb7o.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0eohu0l.fsf@gnu.org> <86czkgm13p.fsf@gnu.org> <83fspchrgd.fsf@gnu.org> <86r18uwxfs.fsf@gnu.org> <83bkzyhbsc.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq5fp0h.fsf@gnu.org> <865yq5md9v.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmoddwzx.fsf@gnu.org> <86k0el5ek3.fsf@gnu.org> <83lez1dslv.fsf@gnu.org> <86o83w8b7y.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8y4cb04.fsf@gnu.org> <877dajesbb.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8289"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 53497@debbugs.gnu.org, Arash Esbati To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 29 08:44:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nDiP2-0001x7-Fp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:44:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54690 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDiP1-00012L-7d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 02:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDiM2-0000wG-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 02:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDiM2-0001FQ-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 02:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDiM2-0007Ho-HH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 02:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 07:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53497.164344204127971 (code B ref 53497); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 07:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2022 07:40:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDiLh-0007H5-Cn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 02:40:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:63399) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDiLf-0007Gv-LV for 53497@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 02:40:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 20T7ec4m026617 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 07:40:38 GMT In-Reply-To: <877dajesbb.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:30:32 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225509 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> I suspect this is related to the recent changes of where >> `native-comp-eln-load-path' is set, maybe Lars can comment. > > That's certainly possible -- it's really difficult to trace the logic > here in the startup code. Yeah our startup has a lot of hidden dependecies. > Does moving the setting earlier again fix the problem? If you refer to bf695b937e that's not sufficient, the test was done with it installed. I haven't checked if bf695b937e has restored the state of say one week ago (in terms of where we set native-comp-eln-load-path) or not. But yeah the bottom line is that indeed we need to have native-comp-eln-load-path set before we expect the native compiler machinery to work. Best Regards Andrea