From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57627: 29.0.50; [native-compilation] cl-loaddefs.el recompiled on startup Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:47:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87bkrsr1g2.fsf@gnus.org> <875yi0qz5b.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfl4ihfo.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtbcp774.fsf@gnus.org> <877d2e5ba1.fsf@gnus.org> <87czc4v5id.fsf@gnus.org> <874jxfsv9o.fsf@gnus.org> <874jw6d6cl.fsf@gnus.org> <871qr95r8z.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0502n6s.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27662"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: germanp82@hotmail.com, 57627@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 09:50:23 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1okKtD-0006xG-9h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:50:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okKt6-0000xP-RC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:50:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okKru-0000rL-5f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okKrt-0004Ri-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okKrt-000300-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57627 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57627-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57627.166599288411434 (code B ref 57627); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57627) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2022 07:48:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47107 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okKqx-0002yM-JF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okKqr-0002xS-Iy for 57627@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 29H7ltqW010674 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:47:56 GMT In-Reply-To: <87k0502n6s.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2022 10:21:47 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:245691 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >> Re-reading this discussion what I see is two different options, neither >> of which is significantly better than the other. >> So the motivation to change is not very high. > > True. > > So I've now implemented Stefan's suggestion (i.e., just putting a > puthash into the .elc file if the file-local variable says so), and it > seems to work fine. > > Andrea, does this look OK to you? In principle absolutely, but I've two questions: Why not to use `native-comp-deferred-compilation-deny-list' instead of adding `native-comp--no-native-compile'? If we can't use `native-comp-deferred-compilation-deny-list' maybe we should rename `native-comp--no-native-compile' to `comp--no-native-compile'? This is the scheme we used for variables that are not supposed to be manipulated by the user. Thanks Andrea