From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:43:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83y2eap33a.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfa6kl8s.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7ktlwuy.fsf@gnu.org> <65e12b1d547420e10a19cdad6a33198926abb527.camel@redhat.com> <8335wdknbw.fsf@gnu.org> <83im58k8rb.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfa3iqv3.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0pniq1n.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7krinob.fsf@gnu.org> <83blazijup.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2e3gmmm.fsf@gnu.org> <83wntnglq5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39733"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 21:44:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRgl7-000AAp-TE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:44:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRgl6-0005wB-SI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRgl0-0005w2-Rg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRgl0-00009e-K9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRgl0-0006Qo-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161721980124648 (code B ref 46495); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2021 19:43:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRgkL-0006PU-Fr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:51872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRgkJ-0006PL-63 for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 12VJhHKs008353 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:43:18 GMT In-Reply-To: <83wntnglq5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:35:30 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203390 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, dmalcolm@redhat.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:22:54 +0000 >> >> > comp-7672a6ed-ad0cbb8b.eln >> > comp-7672a6ed-58fb0518.eln >> > comp-7672a6ed-9f0b1563.eln >> > >> > Is this expected? What does the second hash depend on? >> >> The second hash is the one based on the source file content. >> >> I see why, every time we compile a new eln we call >> `comp-clean-up-stale-eln' to remove the old .eln. But we exclude from >> the clean-up the eln system directory (the last in >> `comp-eln-laod-path'). > > So with these 3 files in that directory, which one will be loaded by > Emacs, and how will Emacs know which to load? Emacs will scan and hash the source file and load the correct one if present. >> I don't remember if the reason is that when Emacs is installed this is >> typically read only or there's some other reason. Probably we should >> remove this limitation and handle correctly the case where we are not >> able of removing the file if necessary. > > Probably. But didn't you try that recently and found that something > broke as result? Yeah, you see now how terrible is my memory :) please see my other mail on this. Thanks Andrea