From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44746: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Noisy "*Warnings*" buffer shown on start Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:56:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83o8g7qovi.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2faq3td.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35869"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 44746@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 19:57:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFiIX-0009Dr-Am for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:57:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53444 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFiIW-0002xv-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:57:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFiIQ-0002xc-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFiIQ-0004nL-8d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFiIQ-0002x1-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrea Corallo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44746 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44746-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44746.161436579911298 (code B ref 44746); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44746) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 18:56:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFiI3-0002w8-Aj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:56:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:52666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFiI1-0002w1-KK for 44746@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:56:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 11QIuaGF025609 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:56:36 GMT In-Reply-To: <83y2faq3td.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:52:30 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200880 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: 44746-done@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se >> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:27:26 +0000 >> >> > Btw, I think the doc string of comp-async-report-warnings-errors could >> > use some love: as it stands now, I needed to read the code where it is >> > used to understand what it does, and why it is a defcustom. Some of >> > the explanation you, Andrea, wrote in this thread could find its way >> > into the doc string and make it much more clear. >> >> Right I tried with ad74b1b2b6, please have a look an let me know in >> case. > > Thanks, it was very good. I made some minor improvements (the main of > which is to tell that people who are annoyed by the warnings should > set this to a nil value). Thanks Andrea